Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 22:06:29 -0600 From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org> To: "Andrew R. Reiter" <arr@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net>, security@FreeBSD.org, alc@FreeBSD.org, security-officer@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: AIO vulnerability (from bugtraq) Message-ID: <20011210220629.T92148@elvis.mu.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1011210223111.15465A-100000@fledge.watson.org>; from arr@FreeBSD.org on Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 10:31:27PM -0500 References: <20011210202249.Q92148@elvis.mu.org> <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1011210223111.15465A-100000@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Andrew R. Reiter <arr@FreeBSD.org> [011210 21:31] wrote:
>
> So your email stated that there was a security officer response?
No, my email clearly stated that AIO is not on by default and has
a large glaring blinking neon sign hanging off it stating use at
your own risk.
I thought it would painfully obvious that it doesn't require a
security officer responce.
--
-Alfred Perlstein [alfred@freebsd.org]
'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "1970s technology,"
start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.'
http://www.morons.org/rants/gpl-harmful.php3
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011210220629.T92148>