Date: Wed, 13 May 1998 03:06:13 +0300 (EEST) From: Petri Helenius <pete@sms.fi> To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> Cc: Guido van Rooij <guido@gvr.org>, peter@netplex.com.au (Peter Wemm), dag-erli@ifi.uio.no, net@FreeBSD.ORG, core@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: INRIA IPv6 on FreeBSD Message-ID: <13656.58219.715765.24138@silver.sms.fi> In-Reply-To: <2990.894997902@time.cdrom.com> References: <199805121802.UAA18013@gvr.gvr.org> <2990.894997902@time.cdrom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jordan K. Hubbard writes: > > From what I've heart, the INRIA stack is indeed a good one so I would > > opt for the INRIA one (I do not have personal experience with it though). > > And that's the real essence of the problem here... Most of the people > who've even bothered to formulate an opinion on this issue so far have > also yet to actually seriously _look_ at any of the available > implementations. :-( I've been using the INRIA stuff for >6 months now and I'm happy with that with the exception of the pain I've to go through when I need to match -stable patches to the INRIA code which gets up-ported only every now and then. > > I appreciate that people's time is limited, especially for > bleeding-edge issues like IPv6, but perhaps a working group could be > formed at this point to go actually study the various options far more > substantially before we move on to the stage of talking seriously > about committing anything? > IPv6 is going to hit the road sometime later this year and it'd be sad to see freebsd sitting on a bus stop at that time. Pete To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?13656.58219.715765.24138>