Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2002 08:33:18 -0500 (EST) From: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Cyrille Lefevre <cyrille.lefevre@laposte.net> Cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Status of lukemftpd? (was: cvs commit: src/etc inetd.conf (fwd)) Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1021108083228.16641D-100000@fledge.watson.org> In-Reply-To: <20021105204013.GC56253@gits.dyndns.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 5 Nov 2002, Cyrille Lefevre wrote: > On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 12:33:41AM -0400, Robert Watson wrote: > > > > On Sat, 26 Oct 2002, David O'Brien wrote: > > > > > > (1) All references to lukemftpd as "the ftpd" be corrected to indicate > > > > lukemftpd is not the default. Most of these are leaked references > > > > from lukemftpd man pages that were not updated in the import. > > > > > > We typically don't rewrite contrib'ed vendor branch code. On some of my > > > systems lukemftp is THE ftpd, so they do apply. > > > > Just to make it completely clear what I'm talking about here: we do have a > > "the ftpd", because we install it as /usr/libexec/ftpd. Lukemftpd is > > installed as /usr/libexec/lukemftpd. Documentation should refer to the > > binaries and man pages correctly. One specific example of this is > > ftpd.conf(5), which incorrectly stats: > > how about the following PR ? > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/39676 This PR looks like it would pretty cleanly address the first set of problems I identified regarding the man pages being inaccurate. Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Projects robert@fledge.watson.org Network Associates Laboratories To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.NEB.3.96L.1021108083228.16641D-100000>