Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 29 Sep 2004 16:01:18 -0700
From:      Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To:        TM4525@aol.com
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Freebsd 5.2.1 Performance Woes
Message-ID:  <20040929230118.GA43201@xor.obsecurity.org>
In-Reply-To: <fa.2e69790.2e8c8879@aol.com>
References:  <fa.2e69790.2e8c8879@aol.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

[-- Attachment #1 --]
On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 05:51:53PM -0400, TM4525@aol.com wrote:
> While I was had a nice little test set up, I figured I'd test Freebsd 4.9 
> against 5.2.1 since I had fresh installs handy on separate drives.
> The simple test was as follows:
> 
> Hardware:
> 
> Celeron 2.4Ghz processor
> Dual onboard Intel (em) NICs, 32bit, 33Mhz bus
> 
> Setup:
> 
> Traffic Generator -> FreeBSD System -> Server
> 
> I had it set up to route between the 2 interfaces (ie NOT bridged). I
> fired a unidirectional stream of UDP packets (so there was no return traffic
> from the server, which was discarding the packets) at a rate of ~100Kpps. 
> The disturbing results:
> 
> FreeBSD 4.9: 33% interrupt usage
> FreeBSD 5.2.1: >80% interrupt usage
> 
> What has happened to the stack? 

See the Early Adopter's Guide that was distributed with 5.2.1, or just
don't worry about it and update to 5.3 which has vastly better network
performance.

Kris
[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFBWz6+Wry0BWjoQKURAmf/AJ9LvY0r7TiXCUWhl8PoQGLd2TH9HQCfZ9T+
+fTQv+EVLDmVQtqOqTTha5w=
=Sa8H
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040929230118.GA43201>