Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2002 16:34:32 +0200 From: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@starjuice.net> To: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Boris Popov <bp@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/netsmb smb_conn.h smb_smb.c Message-ID: <20020917143432.GL72320@starjuice.net> In-Reply-To: <3D8734AC.ABCC329A@FreeBSD.org> References: <3D85BE19.59196A84@FreeBSD.org> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0209162134040.1544-100000@lion.butya.kz> <20020916154308.GC28848@vega.vega.com> <20020917132617.GJ72320@starjuice.net> <3D8734AC.ABCC329A@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On (2002/09/17 16:57), Maxim Sobolev wrote: > > This was the big benefit FreeBSD expected out of Apple's use of our code > > -- the receipt of bugfixes and perhaps even enhancements from folks paid > > to hack on it. :-) > > This question needs more study, because patches applied by Darwin's > hackers/Apple's engineers to BSD code aren't necesarily BSD licensed > as well. BSDL is not a GPLV, which infects all derivative work, quite > on contrary, I'd expect all Apple changes being APL licensed, not BSDL > licensed. What I was trying to put across was that we expected something from Apple, and that we have relationships with folks there. In Boris' case, the changes he gets back from them are back-contributed. Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020917143432.GL72320>