Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 11:46:00 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org> To: Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com> Cc: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net> Subject: Re: SF Bay area hackfest Message-ID: <20040324194600.GA8779@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10403231616280.23950-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com> References: <20040323140429.L55727@pooker.samsco.home> <Pine.GSO.4.10.10403231616280.23950-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 04:49:51PM -0500, Daniel Eischen wrote: > I don't quite understand why you need commitments for a toolchain > upgrade. From what I understand, TLS support can't happen without > it, and by deferring the toolchain update you prevent it from > getting done. But I'll play along regardless... SMPng and KSE are both projects that haven't been completed because the project only had commitments for the 1st part of the work. I refused to pushed to import new toolchain bits for the to sit dormant not being used. I'd rather use my time working on another part of FreeBSD if the net of my time & effort is a NOP.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040324194600.GA8779>