Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 22:43:37 +0000 From: John Birrell <jb@what-creek.com> To: John Merryweather Cooper <john_m_cooper@yahoo.com> Cc: ????????? Bill Hacker <askbill@conducive.net>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Tinderbox Message-ID: <20071120224337.GB12810@what-creek.com> In-Reply-To: <543425.44000.qm@web50704.mail.re2.yahoo.com> References: <543425.44000.qm@web50704.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 07:35:42AM -0800, John Merryweather Cooper wrote:
> Could not -fno-strict-aliasing be considered as just another WARN level?
> At least then, there might be some pressure to eliminate strict aliasing
> warnings as a necessary component to moving to a higher WARN level.
>
This is something I'd like to do right now as "a step in the right
direction".
RCS file: /u/freebsd/cvsup/src/src/share/mk/bsd.sys.mk,v
retrieving revision 1.43
diff -r1.43 bsd.sys.mk
11,12d10
< NO_WERROR=
<
78a77,80
> .if defined(NO_WARNS) || (defined(WARNS) && ${WARNS} == 0)
> CFLAGS += -fno-strict-aliasing
> .endif
>
and remove it from the default CFLAGS in sys.mk
--
John Birrell
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20071120224337.GB12810>