Date: Sat, 08 Mar 1997 17:04:33 -0500 From: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net> To: Sonja Jo Krenz-Bush <sjkb@abstractsoft.com>, isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: inn 1.5.1 on freebsd Message-ID: <3.0.1.32.19970308170433.00ac06e0@sentex.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSI.3.95.970308131758.494D-100000@mx.serv.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 01:19 PM 3/08/97 -0800, Sonja Jo Krenz-Bush wrote: >We're looking at upgrading to inn 1.5.1 on our news server. (News is >working right now, so we're either stupid or masochists.) Any pitfalls of >using it under FreeBSD we should be aware of? Also, out of curiousity, >what kind of improvements, if any, are people seeing when they upgrade? We saw a significant improvement in the amount of articles we could process... Also, innd was much more responsive and memory friendly as well. It was worth the upgrade for us, and actually wasnt that painful at all. ---Mike ********************************************************************** Mike Tancsa (mike@sentex.net) * To do is to be -- Nietzsche Sentex Communications Corp, * To be is to do -- Sartre Cambridge, Ontario * Do be do be do -- Sinatra (http://www.sentex.net/~mdtancsa) *
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3.0.1.32.19970308170433.00ac06e0>