Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 15:44:57 -0500 (EST) From: "Andrew R. Reiter" <arr@FreeBSD.org> To: "Bruce A. Mah" <bmah@packetdesign.com> Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: RFC: MFC M_ZERO usage for bpf.c Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1011127154420.18848A-100000@fledge.watson.org> In-Reply-To: <200111272040.fARKeea01058@nimitz.packetdesign.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Yea, I think MFC'ing it would be fine. Don't hesitate to thwap me one if you guys think I should MFC some things Im not. Cheers, Andrew On Tue, 27 Nov 2001, Bruce A. Mah wrote: :If memory serves me right, "Andrew R. Reiter" wrote: : :> Just as a note, I decided against MFC'ing this and similar changes because :> I didn't feel it was necesary for -STABLE to have this "fix." : :I agree it's not necessary. I'm reviewing some other BPF patches :(which have been sitting in my queue for way too long) and I wanted to :sync up bpf.c on HEAD and RELENG_4 a little bit before diving in. : :Bruce. : : : -- Andrew R. Reiter arr@watson.org arr@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.NEB.3.96L.1011127154420.18848A-100000>