Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 2 Jul 2001 14:43:12 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
To:        Alfred Perlstein <bright@sneakerz.org>
Cc:        current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: RFC: Kernel thread system nomenclature.
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.21.0107021441550.13213-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>
In-Reply-To: <20010702145414.R84523@sneakerz.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


On Mon, 2 Jul 2001, Alfred Perlstein wrote:

> Oh what a bikeshed you've begun. :)
> 
> Proc, this keeps the unix convention, a task is confusing, at least
> to me because afaik in Linux a task is actually a thread.  Keeping it
> as proc will also require fewer changes to the code. :)
Actually this would REDUCE teh size of the change..

MOST of the proc pointers will be changeing to #4 whatever that becomes.
calling THAT proc would be the easiest :-)



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0107021441550.13213-100000>