Date: Sat, 5 Dec 1998 23:23:47 +0100 (CET) From: Wilko Bulte <wilko@yedi.iaf.nl> To: jb@cimlogic.com.au (John Birrell) Cc: mjacob@feral.com, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: sys/compile directories... Message-ID: <199812052223.XAA24795@yedi.iaf.nl> In-Reply-To: <199812052215.JAA26976@cimlogic.com.au> from John Birrell at "Dec 6, 98 09:15:52 am"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As John Birrell wrote... > Matthew Jacob wrote: > > > > Umm, now that we have alpha as well as i386 regularly compiling along, > > would it be conceivable to have the compile directory become either > > sys/compile/<ARCH>/<CONFIGNAME> or have it as part of sys/<ARCH>/compile > > (I probably prefer the latter- but in either case, I use the same sys tree > > for developing both, and two different GENERIC's are a problem..) > > I've already asked for this and received less that favourable responses. > Bruce wanted to have the build use an obj tree. i386 people wanted > not change (POLA). We _do_ need to resolve this issue. It's annoying. It sure *(*&*& is. It just bit me 2 minutes ago.. Not changing it is IMHO not a sensible solution. > With the possibility of support for more architectures coming, it will > only get worse. Very much so yes. Wilko _ ______________________________________________________________________ | / o / / _ Bulte email: wilko@yedi.iaf.nl |/|/ / / /( (_) Arnhem, The Netherlands WWW : http://www.tcja.nl ______________________________________________ Powered by FreeBSD __________ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199812052223.XAA24795>