Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2021 14:08:56 -0400 From: Alejandro Imass <aimass@yabarana.com> To: ezekiel motta <ezekielmotta017@gmail.com> Cc: FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: FreeBSD Message-ID: <CAHieY7TiEraYcrPa7Km2xVpkqCcfvsEVL6Vn312tD2ymA1iq9A@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAMGoz4UCE%2BXJTtu9-d-tke3J%2BgH71xfhO_JaVupZW6Cdk=abNA@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAMGoz4Vus=gQHY4CH2kmaX7Q19GawG084sk1dLvtUEHVa0v=VQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAHieY7R0n5CJkB8HpFVK1_nBSsEgR%2BLqk_rvTU-EuCUZu0M7Hg@mail.gmail.com> <CAMGoz4UCE%2BXJTtu9-d-tke3J%2BgH71xfhO_JaVupZW6Cdk=abNA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 1:22 PM ezekiel motta <ezekielmotta017@gmail.com> wrote: > Precisely. Apple is parasitical, but so is everyone else. Google's use of > Linux, Torvald's use of Unix, Ubuntu's use of Debian, PopOS use of Ubuntu= , > Manjaro's use of Arch, ad infinitum. > There is nothing morally repugnant about it, just as there is nothing > repugnant about the remora's behaviour vis a vis the shark. > I did not mean it as a moralistic comment. > > Parasitical usually means all take and no give back which IMHO is very well represented by Oracle and their CEO actually saying it out aloud: "Larry Ellison: =E2=80=9CIf an Open Source Product Gets Good Enough, We=E2=80=99ll= Simply Take It.=E2=80=9D Most everyone else you mentioned above has given a lot of valu= e to their original projects. For example, Ubuntu has probably given more to Debian than people might realize. E.g. If you have a hardware issue in Debian, you will probably find the answer in an Ubuntu forum or mailing list, and most of the time, these patches make their way back to Debian and/or the Linux kernel. I think derived works and/or forks are more of an ecosystem model than parasitical. There are some notable exceptions, but in general I think that most who fork, will happily give back to their upstream. Back to FreeBSD, IMO the Desktop is definitively not the focus, although there are many hard-core FBSD users who use it as a workstation. The opportunity is there, especially with FBSD's licencing, but I think it requires some financial benefit to make it worthwhile to invest in the arduous process of maintaining workstation type software, and convincing partners to join your cause, for example basic stuff like Skype or Zoom. IIRC iXsystems tried this with TrueOS, I am guessing inspired by their success with FreeNAS, but eventually killed the project: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TrueOS IMO (and this is not criticism) the core FreeBSD is not really interested in the applications of FreeBSD as such but more to maintain the original and purest possible form of Unix remaining on the planet. That is why I don't see *BSD projects as parasitical at all, but rather focused implementations / applications of FreeBSD. Best, --=20 Alejandro Imass
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAHieY7TiEraYcrPa7Km2xVpkqCcfvsEVL6Vn312tD2ymA1iq9A>