Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2011 15:52:04 +0200 From: Gabor Kovesdan <gabor@FreeBSD.org> To: Glen Barber <gjb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: doceng@FreeBSD.org, doc@FreeBSD.org, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ulrich_Sp=F6rlein?= <uqs@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: Conversion to SVN Message-ID: <4E91A704.4090001@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4E8F1BE1.7080003@FreeBSD.org> References: <20111007141312.GJ26743@acme.spoerlein.net> <4E8F1BE1.7080003@FreeBSD.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On 2011.10.07. 17:33, Glen Barber wrote: > A bigger reason I think this would be a good thing is actually a rather > obvious one: those of us (doc folks) tracking -CURRENT can document > things as they happen. More specifically, we would not have to wait > until we are nearing a release to begin updating documentation that is > relevant to that release. This way, doc/www HEAD (well, not necessarily > www for this case...) would be as up-to-date as possible with -CURRENT, > which I believe will benefit all of us (especially our users) when > release time is near. Yes, this is a very strong reason and is very demanded, imho. Besides, release notes are doc-related stuff and are in src. This means that doc infrastructure code is scattered through repositories. Gaborhelp
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4E91A704.4090001>