Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2003 22:23:15 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org> To: Maxime Henrion <mux@freebsd.org> Cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: WARNS=6 changes Message-ID: <20030316062315.GA75492@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20030313192045.GG3819@elvis.mu.org> References: <20030313192045.GG3819@elvis.mu.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 08:20:45PM +0100, Maxime Henrion wrote: > I've been told it would be good to post this change here for discussion, > so here it is. This patch changes the default standard used for > warnings from c89 to c99. Hi Maxime, I am all for this change of making our C standard level C99. Do you think we should do this for lower WARNS than 6? As far as warnings go, -ansi (aka, -std=c89) is responsable for all the 'long long' warnings and that is why it was done at WARNS==6. Since that will go away, maybe we should turn on -std= at a lower WARNS. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030316062315.GA75492>