Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2005 11:27:01 -0800 From: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org> To: Gleb Kurtsov <k-gleb@yandex.ru> Cc: Dan Cojocar <dan.cojocar@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Interrupt storm Message-ID: <424EF205.6010202@root.org> In-Reply-To: <20050402111839.GA847@h1.d> References: <b37cb09705032911295ce15f84@mail.gmail.com> <6.2.1.2.0.20050329143237.02f15990@64.7.153.2> <b37cb09705032912293d76ecf6@mail.gmail.com> <20050329154013.B52981@lexi.siliconlandmark.com> <b37cb097050329231336345ce@mail.gmail.com> <20050330104117.A52981@lexi.siliconlandmark.com> <b37cb0970503300926cbfa252@mail.gmail.com> <20050330123458.T52981@lexi.siliconlandmark.com> <424C41C3.50705@root.org> <b37cb0970503311038379c9a5a@mail.gmail.com> <20050402111839.GA847@h1.d>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Gleb Kurtsov wrote: > On (31/03/2005 21:38), Dan Cojocar wrote: > >>On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 10:30:27 -0800, Nate Lawson <nate@root.org> wrote: >> >>>Andre Guibert de Bruet wrote: >>> >>>>On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Dan Cojocar wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>>On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 10:53:48 -0500 (EST), Andre Guibert de Bruet wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Dan Cojocar wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>I tried running GENERIC and i get the following lor and watchdog >>>>>>>timeout, no interrupt storms: >>>>>> >>>>>>--- 8< --- <snip> --- 8< --- >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> Here is the full dmesg: http://cs.ubbcluj.ro/~dan/dmesg.txt.generic >>>>>>> I tried also my kernel with apic, i don't get interrupt storms but >>>>>>>i get watchdog timeout message just like with GENERIC. >>>>>>>Here is the full dmesg: http://cs.ubbcluj.ro/~dan/dmesg.txt.apic >>>>>>> And finally i tried my kernel without apic and without acpi, it's >>>>>>>running just fine, no interrupt storms, no watchdog timeout, but i >>>>>>>don't have acpi :(, here is the final >>>>>>>dmesg: http://cs.ubbcluj.ro/~dan/dmesg.txt.noacpi. > > if you want to get acpi you have to use old acpi pci link code. > cd sys/dev/acpica; cvs update -D 23-Nov-2004 -Pd acpi_pci[^.]* > it works fine for me with recent current. I'm a little confused. I don't know of anyone that has problems with the 6-current PCI irq code that works on 5-stable (which is what your cvs command updates it to). Do either of you have a problem with irq routing on 6-current that works on 5-stable? Please send details if so. -- Nate
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?424EF205.6010202>