Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 10:20:25 -0800 From: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Cc: NGie Cooper <yaneurabeya@gmail.com>, remko@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Revisiting "Bug 46062 - Remove skel from BSD.root.dist" Message-ID: <1580231.TzCMMyCl6z@ralph.baldwin.cx> In-Reply-To: <AE520AC1-009C-4C05-BC42-BFF41F716199@gmail.com> References: <AE520AC1-009C-4C05-BC42-BFF41F716199@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tuesday, November 10, 2015 02:22:10 AM NGie Cooper wrote: > Hi again, > =09I did some digging around and found a past discussion started by r= emko on the topic of removing /usr/share/skel 8 years ago: https://list= s.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch/2007-November/007162.html . The di= scussion didn=E2=80=99t yield anything (unfortunately) as far as whethe= r or not the directory should be removed (it=E2=80=99s empty right now)= . /etc/skel is used by Linux, NetBSD, OpenBSD, and Solaris for skeleton= files; FreeBSD uses /usr/share/skel instead. Should the path be linked= to /usr/share/skel or deleted (potential patch here: https://people.fr= eebsd.org/~ngie/remove-etc-skel.patch )? Removing /etc/skel you mean? It's empty, but /usr/share/skel is not em= pty. Does anything outside of the base system use /etc/skel or /usr/share/sk= el? --=20 John Baldwin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1580231.TzCMMyCl6z>