Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2000 17:13:55 -0500 (EST) From: Brian Fundakowski Feldman <green@FreeBSD.org> To: Steve Kiernan <stevek@tislabs.com> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: breakage still in sys/systm.h Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0003241712380.1223-100000@green.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.10.10003241706260.13885-100000@mufasa.va.tislabs.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 24 Mar 2000, Steve Kiernan wrote: > The definitions of major() and minor() in sys/systm.h break usage of the > header. Since sys/types.h defines major() and minor() as macros which > compute the major and minor numbers, this creates an order dependency on > sys/systm.h and sys/types.h. Is this not a bad thing? The sys/types.h header is meant to be included in userland code; the sys/systm.h header is not to be included from outside of kernel code. What possible reason would you have for systm.h in userland code? > -- > Stephen Kiernan > stevek@tislabs.com > NAI Labs, A Division of Network Associates, Inc. -- Brian Fundakowski Feldman \ FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! / green@FreeBSD.org `------------------------------' To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0003241712380.1223-100000>