Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2005 11:46:28 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Divacky Roman <xdivac02@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> Cc: scottl@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 6.0R todo list - hash sizes Message-ID: <20051001154628.GA64006@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20051001085358.GA62022@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> References: <20051001085358.GA62022@stud.fit.vutbr.cz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Sat, Oct 01, 2005 at 10:53:58AM +0200, Divacky Roman wrote: > Hi, > > scottl@ removed: > <td>Nullfs (and perhaps other filesystems) use an absurdly small > hash size that causes significant performance penalties.</td> > > this item from 6.0R todo list. How was this solved? I didnt see any commits > to enlarge the hash values. Its still the same... why it was removed then? It was an incorrect suggestion on my part - it turns out this was not the cause of the performance penalties, and Jeff fixed them long ago. Kris [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDPq9UWry0BWjoQKURAhnHAKDnPk9l/xrlJhthD37VDdhBCJ4HygCdEXSj 7nkMAkoxy0N9Jbn61dSMRsA= =bTym -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051001154628.GA64006>