Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 21:45:57 -0500 From: Glen Barber <gjb@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: swills@FreeBSD.org, freebsd@beardz.net, pav@FreeBSD.org, eadler@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: "postfix-current" broken on amd64 platform Message-ID: <20111115024556.GA23021@glenbarber.us> In-Reply-To: <20111115022430.GA19970@magic.hamla.org> References: <20111114083713.29fbecda@scorpio> <20111115022430.GA19970@magic.hamla.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--EVF5PPMfhYS0aIcm
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 09:24:30PM -0500, Sahil Tandon wrote:
> [ pav@ and those who tested mail/postifx-current on amd64 added to Cc: ]
>=20
> On Mon, 2011-11-14 at 08:37:13 -0500, Jerry wrote:
>=20
> > The "postfix-current" port is still marked as broken:
> >=20
> > .if ${ARCH} =3D=3D "amd64"
> > BROKEN=3D fails during installation
> > .endif
> >=20
> > Since all previous releases of Postfix worked on FreeBSD, and since
> > Postfix is/was developed on FreeBSD, I was wondering what the problem
> > is with this release. Is there a possibility that this phenomena might
> > be rectified in the near future?
>=20
> Thanks for your report, Jerry. You are correct that FreeBSD is the main
> development platform for Postfix. It seems that pointyhat's amd64
> machine throws an error during the install phase. Pav noticed this and
> marked the port BROKEN; however, neither I nor a few others I've
> enlisted can reproduce the error. Would you mind removing the
> conditional that marks this port BROKEN, try to build/install in your
> amd64 environment, and report the results?=20
>=20
> Pav, if nobody else can reproduce the error seen on pointyhat, can
> portmgr look into whether there is something quirky with the amd64
> pointyhat machine?
>=20
I don't have the successful build logs anymore, so I've just re-queued a
build of postfix-current on 9-STABLE (-RC2) amd64 in my tinderbox if
the results are of interest to those that can investigate any potential
pointyhat anomalies.
Regards,
Glen
--=20
Glen Barber | gjb@FreeBSD.org
FreeBSD Documentation Project
--EVF5PPMfhYS0aIcm
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin)
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJOwdJkAAoJEFJPDDeguUajheMIALt7jK6luOL5XhyF0vdwvfo1
ked7VBdc1qcMhSzLA7Opn51lJ1M6eB8RHvQqwZJemtFDvYfyd5EvUw5/MDSItJ9U
wDvWAXvaIHBoK1XIixcyuDWVyjon+lDra/vT7YFjM3OCAz0//Klg9PhK246ESYmM
7z94BGTrkHyvr9FyyGyUGsoPAp7mg+5YYTqcedPkdfYEAvwmGG6EXQ+UH40LwIVO
za5bu3Qm0NYbK8tM9XEjDwQ58GO4DDFW0+QPBI4Bn8u09do6zWRnbhyza2pIhUck
VW83xf0oVt6gMBI0vubQd/DnWjh94Z9pms2mGffLtx+4HouTNz2GpH2A5GTmoNs=
=rLxP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--EVF5PPMfhYS0aIcm--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20111115024556.GA23021>