Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2000 17:40:26 -0500 (EST) From: Steve Kiernan <stevek@tislabs.com> To: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> Cc: Steve Kiernan <stevek@tislabs.com>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: breakage still in sys/systm.h Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.10.10003241739320.13885-100000@mufasa.va.tislabs.com> In-Reply-To: <200003242219.RAA46260@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 24 Mar 2000, Garrett Wollman wrote: > <<On Fri, 24 Mar 2000 17:12:32 -0500 (EST), Steve Kiernan <stevek@tislabs.com> said: > > > The definitions of major() and minor() in sys/systm.h break usage of the > > header. Since sys/types.h defines major() and minor() as macros which > > compute the major and minor numbers, this creates an order dependency on > > sys/systm.h and sys/types.h. Is this not a bad thing? > > No, since they don't conflict. <sys/types.h> defines the major and > minor macros iff _KERNEL is not defined, and <sys/systm.h> is a Ah, okay, I see what the problem is with my filesystem driver. Looks like the #define switched from KERNEL to _KERNEL from 3.x to -CURRENT. Thanks. -- Stephen Kiernan stevek@tislabs.com NAI Labs, A Division of Network Associates, Inc. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.10.10003241739320.13885-100000>