Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 29 May 2003 08:24:50 +0200
From:      Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org>
To:        Pawel Jakub Dawidek <nick@garage.freebsd.pl>
Cc:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: pam_unix.c [PATCH].
Message-ID:  <xzp65nuclsd.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
In-Reply-To: <20030528214651.GK45118@garage.freebsd.pl> (Pawel Jakub Dawidek's message of "Wed, 28 May 2003 23:46:51 %2B0200")
References:  <20030528214651.GK45118@garage.freebsd.pl>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Pawel Jakub Dawidek <nick@garage.freebsd.pl> writes:
> I think there is no need to open a PR for this.
> Argument 'flags' marked as unused is used in those functions:

Yeah.  It shouldn't be, though, pretty much everyone (including the
Sun engineers in charge of PAM) agrees that PAM_DISALLOW_NULL_AUTHTOK
is evil and should go away.

DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzp65nuclsd.fsf>