Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 14:20:11 -0600 (MDT) From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> To: phk@phk.freebsd.dk Cc: nate@root.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sbin/kldunload kldunload.8 kldunload.c Message-ID: <20040713.142011.51857482.imp@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <24061.1089748873@critter.freebsd.dk> References: <40F43DFE.3000402@freebsd.org> <24061.1089748873@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message: <24061.1089748873@critter.freebsd.dk>
"Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> writes:
: In message <40F43DFE.3000402@freebsd.org>, Scott Long writes:
:
: >It typically won't be duplicated. This particular work is good for
: >things like GEOM modules that don't fit into newbus. If at some point
: >in the future newbus becomes aware of pseudo-drivers (drivers not
: >attached by a hardware bus) then this should indeed be revisited.
:
: I wish I could grasp from where this "newbus fits all" attiude
: comes, I certainly see nothing anywhere that could explain it.
Too many years of having weird, odd-ball attachments maybe? That's
why newbus was created: to have a unified heirarchy to make it easier
to write drivers.
Frankly, I dislike your obstructionist attitudes towards newbus.
Warenr
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040713.142011.51857482.imp>