Date: Fri, 13 Mar 1998 13:21:05 -0800 From: Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au> To: "Justin T. Gibbs" <gibbs@plutotech.com> Cc: Damon Permezel <dap@damon.com>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: A question about sys/sys/queue.h Message-ID: <199803132121.NAA02020@dingo.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 13 Mar 1998 11:05:32 MST." <199803131808.LAA15797@pluto.plutotech.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Actually, inline functions will not work for the queue macros unless you > change the way you specify the "links" portion of the object. I agree > that, in general, using an inline is better than using a macro. Just speaking of the queue macros, has anyone noticed (been bitten by) the odd behaviour of the TAILQ_PREV/TAILQ_NEXT macros? (ie. they're not reflexive, and certainly not what you expect of them.) -- \\ Sometimes you're ahead, \\ Mike Smith \\ sometimes you're behind. \\ mike@smith.net.au \\ The race is long, and in the \\ msmith@freebsd.org \\ end it's only with yourself. \\ msmith@cdrom.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199803132121.NAA02020>