Date: Wed, 11 Jun 1997 15:01:26 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> To: toor@dyson.iquest.net (John S. Dyson) Cc: terry@lambert.org, michaelh@cet.co.jp, hasty@rah.star-gate.com, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: vxfs (was Re: overclocking) Message-ID: <199706112201.PAA07223@phaeton.artisoft.com> In-Reply-To: <199706111957.OAA09630@dyson.iquest.net> from "John S. Dyson" at Jun 11, 97 02:57:49 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > Actually, it would not be a difficult port (I worked on the VXFS > > code in UnixWare a bit; I'm fairly familiar with it). The most > > difficult task would be the Vm/Cache issues, mostly because the > > new VM system is poorly documented (good code; bad docs). > > I disagree (here is my correction): > > new VM system is poorly documented (good code; NO docs). > > :-(. I'd fix this for you, if you'd avoid changing it for long enough, and promised to keep the doc up afterwards; of course, if you did that, you'd probably have enough free time that you could doc it yourself faster than I could. Probably by a wide margin, in fact, since I would have to puzzle out the meaning of the changes since the last time I was pounding away down there... ;-). Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199706112201.PAA07223>