Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2006 12:13:49 -0700 (MST) From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> To: kmacy@fsmware.com, kip.macy@gmail.com Cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, harti@freebsd.org, sparc64@freebsd.org, stable@freebsd.org, kris@obsecurity.org, des@des.no Subject: Re: [releng_6 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64 Message-ID: <20060204.121349.06228212.imp@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <b1fa29170602040848p15a21fdibeecbd9ea8d34044@mail.gmail.com> References: <86bqxntixy.fsf@xps.des.no> <20060204.085134.44793895.imp@bsdimp.com> <b1fa29170602040848p15a21fdibeecbd9ea8d34044@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message: <b1fa29170602040848p15a21fdibeecbd9ea8d34044@mail.gmail.com>
Kip Macy <kip.macy@gmail.com> writes:
: IIRC, at NetApp -O2 was the default for all builds. I think it is safe to
: say that the generated code is quite stable. If -O2 allows the compiler to
: catch errors earlier it should be the default.
If things have really changed, then we should change the default and
remove the kludges. My main objection is the mismatch, not the actual
value. Did you remove the kludges in the mk files at netapp to remove
the -fno-strict-alias?
Warner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060204.121349.06228212.imp>