Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 22:17:25 +0100 From: "Simon L. Nielsen" <simon@FreeBSD.org> To: "Matthew D. Fuller" <fullermd@over-yonder.net> Cc: Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org>, FreeBSD AMD list <freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: Sharing /usr/ports between AMD64 and I386 ok? Message-ID: <20051227211724.GJ844@zaphod.nitro.dk> In-Reply-To: <20051227202546.GS63497@over-yonder.net> References: <cone.1135713305.795857.75924.5001@35st-server.simplicato.com> <1135714847.83838.34.camel@localhost> <20051227202546.GS63497@over-yonder.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--uc35eWnScqDcQrv5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2005.12.27 14:25:46 -0600, Matthew D. Fuller wrote: > On Tue, Dec 27, 2005 at 09:20:47PM +0100 I heard the voice of > Pav Lucistnik, and lo! it spake thus: > > Francisco Reyes p??e v ?t 27. 12. 2005 v 14:55 -0500: > >=20 > > > Is /usr/ports the same for AM64 and I386? > >=20 > > The FreeBSD Ports Collection is one and the same across all the > > releases and architectures. >=20 > Just make sure you scrupulously `make clean`, or sooner or later > you'll end up installing a dependancy on the wrong architecture. Not > that I've ever done such a thing, you understand... Or simply set WRKDIRPREFIX in make.conf to some directory on a local file system - then you don't have the overhead of writing temporary files to NFS and the multiple clients NFS mounting the ports collection won't ever clash (at least not wrt. to ports builds). --=20 Simon L. Nielsen --uc35eWnScqDcQrv5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDsa9kh9pcDSc1mlERAiV9AJoDzhGLGn/+B7M3wFoJFbhKgEcOEwCgk9LP tL+MIc94VqSE8f19GWCASCI= =v66i -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --uc35eWnScqDcQrv5--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051227211724.GJ844>