Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 14:05:29 -0400 (EDT) From: "Alexander N. Kabaev" <ak03@gte.com> To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: RE: sx_assert() vs. SX_ASSERT_*() Message-ID: <XFMail.20011023140529.ak03@gte.com> In-Reply-To: <XFMail.011023105243.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I am strongly suport the change :) I had to implement similar function for an unnamed product port for FreeBSD and your changes will definitely minimize my diffs. On 23-Oct-2001 John Baldwin wrote: > Anyone object greatly to making a change to the sx(9) API to use an > sx_assert() > function similar to mtx_assert() for mutexes instead of having > several > SX_ASSERT_FOO macros? > > Here is what the new API would look like: > > sx_assert(&foo_lock, SX_LOCKED); > sx_assert(&bar_lock, SX_SLOCKED); > > vs. > > SX_ASSERT_LOCKED(&foo_lock); > SX_ASSERT_SLOCKED(&bar_lock); > > -- > > John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> -- http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ > PGP Key: http://www.baldwin.cx/~john/pgpkey.asc > "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/ > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message -------------------------------------------- E-Mail: Alexander N. Kabaev <ak03@gte.com> Date: 23-Oct-2001 Time: 14:00:00 -------------------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.20011023140529.ak03>