Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 13 Jul 2004 22:43:11 +0200
From:      "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
To:        "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
Cc:        nate@root.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/sbin/kldunload kldunload.8 kldunload.c 
Message-ID:  <25076.1089751391@critter.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 13 Jul 2004 14:33:42 MDT." <20040713.143342.17590193.imp@bsdimp.com> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <20040713.143342.17590193.imp@bsdimp.com>, "M. Warner Losh" writes:

>: >Frankly, I dislike your obstructionist attitudes towards newbus.
>: 
>: Obstructionist ?  That's a pretty harsh word for somebody who has
>: wasted a couple of months trying to write a newbus-ified GEOM.
>
>It just seems that whenever the topic of newbus comes up, you don't
>want to use it.

Can we just say that having tried it out in a couple of the areas
where people keep saying it should go, I appreciate the size of the
gap between what newbus can today and what it needs to learn before
the fully newbusified kernel can be a realistic dream.

That is not obstructionist, that is being realistic.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?25076.1089751391>