Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 17:51:47 +0200 From: Marc Fonvieille <blackend@FreeBSD.org> To: Anatolij Shkodin <nausun@gmail.com> Cc: doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Possible update to handbook? Message-ID: <20080403155147.GA57646@abigail.blackend.org> In-Reply-To: <47F4A87D.4000107@gmail.com> References: <47F4A87D.4000107@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 12:50:53PM +0300, Anatolij Shkodin wrote: > FreeBSD handbook section: > 6.2.4 Firefox, Mozilla and MacromediaŽ Flash??? plugin > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/handbook/desktop-browsers.html > > ----- > > I think the section might be old. It is possible to install the > www/linux-flashplugin9 port (instead of www/linux-flashplugin7) by using > nspluginwrapper, following the instructions provided at > but does it works? I mean: is the linux-flashplugin9 stable? I read many things about the fact people should stick to linux-flashplugin7. > http://www.erikd.se/freebsd/freebsd-flash-in-firefox/ > This document is about linux-flashplugin7 not linux-flashplugin9. To sum up: it's Ok to change the current doc for www/nspluginwrapper since this one can be used under both i386/amd64 arch. But regarding the flashplugin version, the linux-flashplugin7 is known to be stable (most of time) but I'm not sure the same can be said for linux-flashplugin9. -- Marc
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080403155147.GA57646>