Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 21:24:14 -0800 From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: Greg Lewis <glewis@eyesbeyond.com> Cc: Lev Serebryakov <lev@freebsd.org>, Paul Allen <nospam@ugcs.caltech.edu>, Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org>, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: KSE, libpthread & libthr: almost newbie question Message-ID: <45458C7E.50104@elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <20061029182108.GA46604@misty.eyesbeyond.com> References: <917908193.20061027102647@serebryakov.spb.ru> <20061027103924.F79313@fledge.watson.org> <45426071.7020403@elischer.org> <602423478.20061028001449@serebryakov.spb.ru> <4542896D.1050001@elischer.org> <20061027231642.GJ30707@riyal.ugcs.caltech.edu> <45429703.8070305@elischer.org> <20061028104741.Q69980@fledge.watson.org> <45442A35.2030803@elischer.org> <20061029090309.T27107@fledge.watson.org> <20061029182108.GA46604@misty.eyesbeyond.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Greg Lewis wrote: > If you really want to know, just send the running process a SIGQUIT and > it will dump the currently running threads to stdout. But yes, 1.4 and 1.5 > both use "native" threads which correspond 1:1 with OS threads (plus > there are threads the JVM creates itself, as you note). The JVM threads > include garbage collection and AWT event handlers at least. > I gather it doesn't use libpthread, but rather just the syscalls?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?45458C7E.50104>