Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 22:06:53 +0800 From: Adrian Chadd <adrian.chadd@gmail.com> To: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RFT: if_ath HAL refactoring Message-ID: <AANLkTi=7t=KKbHc2TJRsA=43t7eQtpshQVqyXT-aXMM4@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201009200925.10362.jhb@freebsd.org> References: <AANLkTikZUZ3%2BW%2Bikyiiw-L-X5v4t4EgTNF4vFf4w=oyK@mail.gmail.com> <201009200925.10362.jhb@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 20 September 2010 21:25, John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> wrote: > Why not include this iff both 'device ath' and 'device pci' are included? > That is what is normally done for bus-specific attachments. I've not idea right now whether there's an Atheros SoC with an AHB-attached wireless device and a PCI bus. In fact, that won't work at the present time because the device names would clash. I'm happy to do that in whatever form the eventual merged codebase takes. Adrian
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTi=7t=KKbHc2TJRsA=43t7eQtpshQVqyXT-aXMM4>