Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 19:33:43 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Anish Mistry <mistry.7@osu.edu> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ule+preempt? Message-ID: <20050427023343.GA55926@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <200504262200.17379.mistry.7@osu.edu> References: <17006.19740.605509.984940@roam.psg.com> <200504261135.07833.mistry.7@osu.edu> <5bbfe7d405042618404e7a6521@mail.gmail.com> <200504262200.17379.mistry.7@osu.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 10:00:17PM -0400, Anish Mistry wrote: > On Tuesday 26 April 2005 09:40 pm, David Leimbach wrote: > > On 4/26/05, Anish Mistry <mistry.7@osu.edu> wrote: > > > On Tuesday 26 April 2005 10:15 am, Randy Bush wrote: > > > > having been seriously burned, i have avoided ule for some > > > > months. i am wondering if the waters have become relatively > > > > safe to go to ule with preemption? > > > > > > I've been running it for few weeks and it seems to be fine for > > > now, but YMMV. > > > > Are you on an SMP box? I have a feeling it's pretty good on a UP > > machine > > > I'm on on UP. Running on SMP will probably reveal the squishy=20 > underbelly to which Kris was referring. I'd expect the same problems to appear less frequently on UP, but with a non-zero probability. Kris --1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCbvoHWry0BWjoQKURAhOfAJ9ZTDdz2iEgTTKf04ncteyTTYByNgCgzDPY v+vUR4fZrFIjiFucTvfUdNo= =0wVI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050427023343.GA55926>