Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2007 03:26:43 +0900 From: Norikatsu Shigemura <nork@FreeBSD.org> To: Jung-uk Kim <jkim@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, Norikatsu Shigemura <nork@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: Cannot mount linprocfs by unresolving sysvs?m symbols Message-ID: <20070407032643.72fd55df.nork@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <200704061351.30424.jkim@FreeBSD.org> References: <20070407023855.ede13b76.nork@FreeBSD.org> <200704061351.30424.jkim@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 6 Apr 2007 13:51:20 -0400 Jung-uk Kim <jkim@freebsd.org> wrote: > > --- linprocfs.c 30 Mar 2007 17:56:44 -0000 1.108 > > +++ linprocfs.c 6 Apr 2007 17:33:05 -0000 > > @@ -1238,3 +1238,5 @@ > > PSEUDOFS(linprocfs, 1); > > MODULE_DEPEND(linprocfs, linux, 1, 1, 1); > > MODULE_DEPEND(linprocfs, procfs, 1, 1, 1); > > +MODULE_DEPEND(linprocfs, sysvmsg, 1, 1, 1); > > +MODULE_DEPEND(linprocfs, sysvsem, 1, 1, 1); > Looks good. I will commit it shortly. > BTW, 'linux' module depends on these modules. Is loading 'dependency > of dependency' broken? Should we have to explicitly tell it to load > the dependencies? Am I missing something here? :-( 'dependency of dependency' you saied is not broken. It's specification:-) of kernel symbol resolver. It can resolve one level export symbols:-(.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070407032643.72fd55df.nork>