Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 17:58:21 +0100 From: "Sparrevohn, Thomas" <thomas.sparrevohn@eds.com> To: "'Dan Nelson'" <dnelson@allantgroup.com> Cc: "'omestre@freeshell.org'" <omestre@freeshell.org> Subject: RE: rpc.lockd Message-ID: <2946E9F05C8DD511A7DC0002A5608CE4BEC3A6@GBCHM201>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Most likely - I noticed that I did not release the pages - but due to the other error I was trying to figure out what kept the pages inactive without releasing them. It rules out rpc.statd, Thanks -- Thomas -----Original Message----- From: Dan Nelson [mailto:dnelson@allantgroup.com] Sent: 30 April 2003 17:36 To: Sparrevohn, Thomas Cc: 'omestre@freeshell.org'; 'freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org' Subject: Re: rpc.lockd In the last episode (Apr 30), Sparrevohn, Thomas said: > After changing my FS to UFS2 yesterday I saw strange behaviour from > rpc.statd and rpc.lockd - The statd process grew to 256MB in size. > There are memory leaks some where in the 5.0-Release with UFS2 that I > did not see with UFS1 - It seems that inactive pages are never > reclaimed and on a 1GB system during a make world I ended up with 8MB > free. rpc.statd is always that size; you probably never noticed it before. It mmaps a 256MB window, but only uses a couple KB of it. http://www.FreeBSD.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/admin.html#STATD-MEM-LE AK -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2946E9F05C8DD511A7DC0002A5608CE4BEC3A6>