Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 04:01:46 -0700 (MST) From: "Forrest W. Christian" <forrestc@imach.com> To: "Tolpanov, Dmitry" <tdn@stack.ru> Cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Router based on FreeBSD. Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0112110400040.14453-100000@workhorse.iMach.com> In-Reply-To: <CA28026327658B478F964AD08A46D4130560CB@exch2k.stack.firm>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 11 Dec 2001, Tolpanov, Dmitry wrote: > I've got a very complex problem so every advice is appreciated. > I've got a router on 4.3-STABLE FreeBSD. It's got hardware (in short): > - Intel Pentium III 500 MHz > - NIC 3Com 10/100 in 100baseTX <full-duplex> > - NIC 3Com 10/100 in 100baseTX <full-duplex> > - NIC 3Com 10/100 in 100baseTX <full-duplex> > - NIC 3Com 900 Combo 10baseT/UTP <full-duplex> > - NIC 3Com 900 Combo 10baseT/UTP <full-duplex> > > Sometimes through this router network works slowly and it is natural > right thing. Therefore we are going to split router on two. Define slowly. Can you see added latency across the router? Personally I'd switch all the cards out for Intel, but that is my preference - and I can't say it would help at all. - Forrest W. Christian (forrestc@imach.com) AC7DE ---------------------------------------------------------------------- The Innovation Machine Ltd. P.O. Box 5749 http://www.imach.com/ Helena, MT 59604 Home of PacketFlux Technogies and BackupDNS.com (406)-442-6648 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Protect your personal freedoms - visit http://www.lp.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0112110400040.14453-100000>