Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 17 Jan 2011 11:15:43 -0800
From:      Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com>
Cc:        cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@FreeBSD.org>, "Sergey A. Osokin" <osa@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: [ports] cvs commit: ports/emulators/wine Makefile
Message-ID:  <4D34955F.9050407@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1101171152470.3109@gerinyyl.fvgr>
References:  <201101170047.p0H0lFTd074412@repoman.freebsd.org> <20110117004719.D6B7F106579A@hub.freebsd.org> <20110117034847.GA11981@FreeBSD.org> <alpine.LNX.2.00.1101171152470.3109@gerinyyl.fvgr>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 01/17/2011 03:40, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Jan 2011, Sergey A. Osokin wrote:
>>> -MAN1=		widl.1 wine.1 winebuild.1 winedbg.1 winedump.1 winegcc.1 \
>>> -		winemaker.1 wineserver.1 wmc.1 wrc.1
>>>   MAN1=		msiexec.1 notepad.1 regedit.1 regsvr32.1 widl.1 wine.1 \
>>>   		wineboot.1 winebuild.1 winecfg.1 wineconsole.1 winedbg.1 \
>>>   		winedump.1 winefile.1 winegcc.1 winemaker.1 winemine.1 \
>> Could you bump PORTREVISION for these changes?
>
> That would be a mistake, since this change is a complete no-op when
> building/installing this port.

If the package is not changed, then you're right, there is no reason to 
bump PORTREVISION.


Doug

-- 

	Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much.
			-- OK Go

	Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
	Yours for the right price.  :)  http://SupersetSolutions.com/




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4D34955F.9050407>