Date: Wed, 5 Nov 1997 08:38:10 -0800 (PST) From: Chris Timmons <skynyrd@opus.cts.cwu.edu> To: Evan Champion <evanc@synapse.net> Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: operator not member of group operator? Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95.971105083706.24563C-100000@opus.cts.cwu.edu> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.971104231234.1575B-100000@cello.synapse.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I get burned by this every time I set up amanda and make /etc/dumpdates group operator, group writeable. If no-one has changed this yet, any objections? -Chris On Tue, 4 Nov 1997, Evan Champion wrote: > Is there any particular reason why user operator is not a member of group > operator? > > The user operator itself is kind of useless; being a member of group > operator is what makes operator what it is -- the userid that dumps are > done as. It can't do its job the way it is currently defined... > > Evan >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.95.971105083706.24563C-100000>