Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 08:15:14 +0200 (CEST) From: Christian Kratzer <ck-lists@cksoft.de> To: dweimer <dweimer@dweimer.net> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: smbfs crashes since approx. 10.1-RELEASE Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.20.1510060813540.16263@noc1.cksoft.de> In-Reply-To: <543b298ddfd6fffaf138c913a650519a@dweimer.net> References: <alpine.BSF.2.20.1510051157450.16263@noc1.cksoft.de> <1721669289.24365403.1444083414400.JavaMail.zimbra@uoguelph.ca> <543b298ddfd6fffaf138c913a650519a@dweimer.net>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
Hi, On Mon, 5 Oct 2015, dweimer wrote: <snipp/> >>> root@noc2:/var/crash # freebsd-version -u >>> 10.2-RELEASE-p5 >>> root@noc2:/var/crash # freebsd-version -k >>> 10.2-RELEASE > > Shouldn't the kernel version also be 10.2-RELEASE-p5? Perhaps the user land > being different than the kernel is causing an issue? > > root@freebsd:/home/dweimer # uname -a > FreeBSD freebsd.dweimer.local 10.2-RELEASE-p5 FreeBSD 10.2-RELEASE-p5 #1 > r288512: Fri Oct 2 13:54:14 CDT 2015 > dweimer@freebsd.dweimer.local:/jails/devel/ROOT/usr/obj/jails/devel/ROOT/usr/src/sys/GENERIC > amd64 > root@freebsd:/home/dweimer # freebsd-version -u > 10.2-RELEASE-p5 > root@freebsd:/home/dweimer # freebsd-version -k > 10.2-RELEASE-p5 as this system is maintained by freebsd-update and there have been no kernel changes from release to p5 the kernel is still showing 10.2-RELEASE. It is normal for systems updated by freebsd-update that the kernel version lags behind the userland. Greetings Christian -- Christian Kratzer CK Software GmbH Email: ck@cksoft.de Wildberger Weg 24/2 Phone: +49 7032 893 997 - 0 D-71126 Gaeufelden Fax: +49 7032 893 997 - 9 HRB 245288, Amtsgericht Stuttgart Mobile: +49 171 1947 843 Geschaeftsfuehrer: Christian Kratzer Web: http://www.cksoft.de/help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.20.1510060813540.16263>