Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 13:20:35 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@freebsd.org> To: Denis Peplin <den@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: TCP Wrappers section (handbook/security): services is not daemons Message-ID: <20041014102035.GA40978@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> In-Reply-To: <416E4DFD.3040203@FreeBSD.org> References: <416E4DFD.3040203@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2004-10-14 13:59, Denis Peplin <den@freebsd.org> wrote: > Hello! > > Please, look at patch attached. > I will commit it if no objections. No objections from here. I think it's a good change. [snip patch that substitutes s/daemon/service/ in `security/chapter.sgml'] The word `daemon' has a more UNIXy sound and is traditionally used when referring to the processes that implement a service, but IMHO what is controlled by tcpwrappers is not access to a process but to the service(s) this process provides. So the word `service' is more appropriate. - Giorgos
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041014102035.GA40978>