Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 21:33:42 +0000 From: Jeff <saturn@serv.net> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fxp0: device timeout Message-ID: <200504262133.42669.saturn@serv.net> In-Reply-To: <20050425200052.GC24146@eeyore.local.dohd.org> References: <20050425183733.GB24146@eeyore.local.dohd.org> <2323.216.177.243.38.1114457612.localmail@webmail.dnswatch.com> <20050425200052.GC24146@eeyore.local.dohd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I am experiencing the fxp0: device timeout as well. uname -a FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE #0: Sat Apr 23 19:52:42 UTC 2005 the kernel is the amd64 and I am running and amd64 processor - Jeff On Monday 25 April 2005 20:00, Mark Huizer wrote: > On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 12:33:32PM -0700, /dev/null wrote: > > I don't want to sound like a smart a$$, or know-it-all. But could this > > not also be a simple case of Induction? Is it possible that something has > > changed in the environment that might interfere with the NIC or cabling? > > I mean it wouldn't have to completely clobber the connection, but simply > > impeed it slightly, which would make it crap out under any type of load. > > Just thought I'd mention it FWIW. > > Well, if such a simple reinstall can make such a big difference, I would > sincerely start questioning computers ;-) > But apart from a table in the attic moving 10 centimeter, nothing > changed. > > Mark
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200504262133.42669.saturn>