Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 2 Jul 2001 15:34:01 -0500
From:      GH <grasshacker@over-yonder.net>
To:        Damieon Stark <visigoth@covertdata.com>
Cc:        current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: unified pwutil library - thoughts?
Message-ID:  <20010702153401.A55131@over-yonder.net>
In-Reply-To: <20010702113626.A21098@morpheus.mn.rr.com>; from visigoth@covertdata.com on Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 11:36:26AM -0500
References:  <20010624210541.A12494@morpheus.mn.rr.com> <20010702113626.A21098@morpheus.mn.rr.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 11:36:26AM -0500, some SMTP stream spewed forth: 
> 
> Hey all...
> 
> So, by the fact that I got _no_ replies I must surmise that either my
> message didn't get posted (confirmed posting with archive), or people
> didn't read it, or _nobody_ thinks it is a good idea ;) but if nobody
> thinks it is a good idea, I _think_ I would have gotten some flames/feedback.
> Here goes again...  Below is the message I sent about a unified libpwutil, and
> possibly integrating it into FreeBSD.  _ANY_ feedback, positive or negitive
> would be appreciated as it will help to validate my existance ;)
> 

It sounds like a good idea to me. It would be more efficient, cleaner,
and easier to maintain and use. 
It would be rather non-standard, though.

gh


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010702153401.A55131>