Date: Sat, 09 Sep 2017 14:52:41 -0500 From: Robert Parkhurst <raparkhurst@digitalsynapse.io> To: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> Cc: FreeBSD-sparc64 <freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Xorg question on FreeBSD 11.1 Message-ID: <1CD52BED-3135-4ED0-A73F-500B1B133B05@digitalsynapse.io> In-Reply-To: <20170909171502.GA22562@lonesome.com> References: <1504912654.4543.5.camel@digitalsynapse.io> <20170909171502.GA22562@lonesome.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I kind of figured. Still though, that=E2=80=99s a bummer!
I will work on my box and see if I can get GCC 4.9 as the default and go fr=
om there. I=E2=80=99ll likely have questions, but I=E2=80=99ll check google before I bo=
mbard you with more.=20
Thank you,
=20
Robert Parkhurst
On 9/9/17, 12:15 PM, "Mark Linimon" <linimon@lonesome.com> wrote:
The problem is that our sparc64 userbase is small, and our userbase
of sparc64/x11 is even smaller.
=20
I do periodic package builds (well, subsets), but I mainly focus on
server-class ports these days. So, I don't remember off the top of my
head what the state of those ports is.
=20
I am traveling and thus it is awkward for me to access my build machine
right now. My first suggestion is that you try to downgrade the defaul=
t
gcc to 4.9 (the last one I have gotten much coverage with) and try agai=
n.
=20
mcl
=20
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1CD52BED-3135-4ED0-A73F-500B1B133B05>