Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 10:50:54 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bug of misc/screen and fifos or ours? Message-ID: <20041119085054.GB83736@gothmog.gr> In-Reply-To: <20041119081734.GC676@loge.nixsys.be> References: <20041118164356.GA46185@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> <20041119081734.GC676@loge.nixsys.be>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On 2004-11-19 09:17, Philip Paeps <philip@freebsd.org> wrote: > On 2004-11-18 18:43:56 (+0200), Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@freebsd.org> wrote: > > The screen-4.0.2 version that misc/screen installs is apparently the latest > > version of screen available. It also contains a zillion bugs, is written in > > a very insecure style, it uses an antiquated version of autoconf script, > > etc. > > Unrelated, perhaps, but has anyone else noticed that on sparc64, the date > stuck in utmp seems to always be '19700101': I'll have a look later today and this weekend to the utmp handling of screen. It may be just a bug that shows up on 64-bit architectures. > | (philip@wotan)~% w > | 9:16am up 7 days, 7:52, 1 user, load averages: 0.08, 0.02, 0.01 > | USER TTY FROM LOGIN@ IDLE WHAT > | philip p1 loge:S.0 01Jan70 - w > > I've not seen this happen on any other platforms... Does anyone on amd64 use screen to see if this happens there too?help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041119085054.GB83736>