Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 22:00:36 -0400 From: Sean Collins <sean@seanmcollins.com> To: current@freebsd.org Cc: Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Three cheers for the status quo, enough now? (was: Re: tmux(1) in base) Message-ID: <9DE63F72-A43A-4704-85E6-A61F1C3CE70C@seanmcollins.com> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.0909240020340.95581@fledge.watson.org> References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.0909240020340.95581@fledge.watson.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I heartily agree with the sentiment that this discussion has yielded no discernible value and has instead left some with bruised egos, and I must say that the lack of _CODE_ is telling. Look, if you think Sendmail and BIND are indeed egregious and far too bloated for your taste, please put your money where your mouth is and release a patch implementing the desired functionality, or reduction in functionality. I use Sendmail and BIND to put food on my table and beer in my fridge, so naturally I'm going to be against any change in the base. However, if I am given a nice and easy option at installation, where BIND and Sendmail are installed as an extra, similar to the WWW option in sysinstall, I'm not going to be opposed to it. That's my two cents as FreeBSD user. Take it for what it's worth. Thank You, Sean Collins -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.12 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAkq60sQACgkQ9g9WSXiROTHOewCfVGu2bIcpdKWmAYZdr9uhw28K P2AAn0IYk61xEmDjVFR8VFSFf+qd+O0c =9lU2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9DE63F72-A43A-4704-85E6-A61F1C3CE70C>