Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 17:17:42 +0400 From: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org> To: Ermal Lu?i <eri@FreeBSD.org> Cc: nerijus.ambrazas@ktu.lt, bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: kern/114095: [carp] carp+pf delay with high state limit Message-ID: <20111017131742.GC51949@glebius.int.ru> In-Reply-To: <CAPBZQG0BU3ARwC7XwKjk1qy-1PYETGuLNDkYk3S=XFrXh4VYEQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <201110151420.p9FEKulv026435@freefall.freebsd.org> <CAPBZQG0BU3ARwC7XwKjk1qy-1PYETGuLNDkYk3S=XFrXh4VYEQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 02:18:38PM +0200, Ermal Lu?i wrote: E> On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 4:20 PM, <glebius@freebsd.org> wrote: E> > Synopsis: [carp] carp+pf delay with high state limit E> > E> > State-Changed-From-To: open->closed E> > State-Changed-By: glebius E> > State-Changed-When: Sat Oct 15 14:20:00 UTC 2011 E> > State-Changed-Why: E> > Not a bug. This is a feature. pfsync(4) suppresses carp(4) E> > preemption until new recently booted node downloads full E> > table of pf(4) states from its peer. E> E> This is not true on FreeBSD. E> The issue might be from other reasons. This is a surprise for me that this feature had been removed! It used to be in stable/6: http://fxr.watson.org/fxr/ident?v=FREEBSD60;i=carp_suppress_preempt And I always treated that variable in CARP as shared with pf. Why did they removed this feature from pfsync? P.S. Since PR is about 6.2-RELEASE, then I have closed it correctly. -- Totus tuus, Glebius.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20111017131742.GC51949>