Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 14:39:19 -0400 From: Kyle Williams <Kyle@1970Jan1-Epo.ch> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Broken IPsec + enc +pf/ipfw Message-ID: <20141021183919.GD2787@1970jan1-epo.ch> In-Reply-To: <54468B43.40602@shrew.net> References: <544535C2.9020301@shrew.net> <544566D2.40303@FreeBSD.org> <544569CF.2060905@shrew.net> <54457599.4060102@yandex.ru> <54458001.6000507@shrew.net> <544611F8.9070403@yandex.ru> <20141021160643.GB2787@1970jan1-epo.ch> <54468B43.40602@shrew.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue Oct 21 11:35:15 2014, Matthew Grooms wrote: >Hey Kyle, > >Thanks for lending a hand. I tested a few myself last night but had no >luck. This morning I received an email off list that pointed to a patch >that was merged to 10 stable. It sounds promising ... > >Log: > Merge r263091: fix mbuf flags clash that lead to failure of operation > of IPSEC and packet filters. > >https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-src-stable-10/2014-March/001111.html > >I won't have a chance to try it until after business hours tonight, but >will report back to the list with my results. Alternately, I assume you >also could upgrade to 10.1-RC2 as the MFC for this patch happened back >in March. I may go this route myself and then bump up to RELEASE in a >few weeks when it happens. r263091, r266800, and r272695 together on 10.0-RELENG works for me. I didn't test r263091 by itself. Thanks! -- Kyle Williams (541) 250 0314 Kyle@1970Jan1-epo.ch PGP key: 0xD1E5BADF
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20141021183919.GD2787>