Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 22:10:20 +0100 From: Brian Somers <brian@Awfulhak.org> To: Mike Barcroft <mike@q9media.com> Cc: Jordan Hubbard <jkh@osd.bsdi.com>, tobex@tobez.org, sobomax@FreeBSD.org, dd@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, brian@Awfulhak.org Subject: Re: Another immediate MFC that isn't really necessary [was: cvs commit: src/libexec/talkd announce.c] Message-ID: <200107132110.f6DLAKW65769@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org> In-Reply-To: Message from Mike Barcroft <mike@q9media.com> of "Fri, 13 Jul 2001 17:17:13 EDT." <200107132117.f6DLHDv25225@coffee.q9media.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Jordan Hubbard <jkh@osd.bsdi.com> writes:
> > I don't think so, and it really should be in the committer's guide.
> > That's a strong hint to the folks who implemented it. :)
>
> No, it's in there. Section 8, Rule 7:
> Changes go to -CURRENT before -STABLE unless specifically permitted by
> the release engineer or unless they're not applicable to -CURRENT.
> Any non-trivial or non-urgent change which is applicable should also
> be allowed to sit in -CURRENT for at least 3 days before merging so
> that it can be given sufficient testing. The release engineer has the
> same authority over the -STABLE branch as outlined for the maintainer
> in rule #5.
The change that started this discussion could not be described as
anything but trivial.
> Best regards,
> Mike Barcroft
--
Brian <brian@freebsd-services.com> <brian@Awfulhak.org>
http://www.freebsd-services.com/ <brian@[uk.]FreeBSD.org>
Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour ! <brian@[uk.]OpenBSD.org>
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200107132110.f6DLAKW65769>