Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 22:10:26 +0200 From: Nicolas Rachinsky <fbsd-mas-0@ml.turing-complete.org> To: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: bug? with zfs, symlinks and extended attributes Message-ID: <20120911201026.GA12674@mid.pc5.i.0x5.de> In-Reply-To: <504F967B.6030108@FreeBSD.org> References: <20120911161049.GA21635@mid.pc5.i.0x5.de> <504F6D9C.2040000@FreeBSD.org> <20120911191452.GA48029@mid.pc5.i.0x5.de> <504F967B.6030108@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org> [2012-09-11 22:52 +0300]: > on 11/09/2012 22:14 Nicolas Rachinsky said the following: > > * Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org> [2012-09-11 19:58 +0300]: > >> on 11/09/2012 19:10 Nicolas Rachinsky said the following: > >>> I can reliable "break" zfs on FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE-p4 (on two different > >>> machines). > >> > >> Please check if http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/240345 may help you. > >> I think that the diff should be applicable to your version. > > > > The patch applies fine, it compiles, but it does not help. > > > > Thanks for your efforts > > In your script do all those "xxx..." actually mean verbatim "xxx..." or are they > just replacements for some scrubbed content? Verbatim "xxx...". There was other content, but replacing that with "xxx..." did not change anything. I did not change the length; when I let every symlink point to "foo", the results changed, and I did not find broken symlinks. Nicolas -- http://www.rachinsky.de/nicolas
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120911201026.GA12674>