Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2003 11:33:00 -0400 (EDT) From: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [acpi-jp 2311] ACPI and PCI vs interrupt routing on Sony VAIO's Message-ID: <XFMail.20030605113300.jhb@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20030604.145404.88473317.imp@bsdimp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 04-Jun-2003 M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <XFMail.20030604143545.jhb@FreeBSD.org> > John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> writes: >: I'm currently working on making the PCI interrupt routing work for SMP >: and once that is done I plan to commit a change to make this >: >: #if defined(__ia64__) || defined(__i386__) >: >: However, if people find that the above patch fixes a lot of UP >: machines for now I might commit it. > > I know that my Fiva 205 works with ACPI as long as I enter the right > overrides to get the right interrupts. I've been using something > similar. > > However, why not all architectures? Ideally, all architectures would route all PCI interrupts, and that is a good goal. However, I'm going to leave that up to each platform to implement and then add themselves to this list. -- John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.20030605113300.jhb>