Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2002 12:12:36 -0500 (EST) From: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Jake Burkholder <jake@locore.ca> Cc: "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@newsguy.com>, Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.ORG>, current@FreeBSD.ORG, re@FreeBSD.ORG, Warner Losh <imp@FreeBSD.ORG>, Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.ORG>, Peter Wemm <peter@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: [REPORT] Upgrade from 4.0-RELEASE to 5.0-CURRENT Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1021201121130.75329A-100000@fledge.watson.org> In-Reply-To: <20021201121355.A26595@locore.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 1 Dec 2002, Jake Burkholder wrote: > Apparently, On Sun, Dec 01, 2002 at 01:15:00PM -0200, > Daniel C. Sobral said words to the effect of; > > > There I go reply to all... <sigh> > > > > IIRC, we never supported upgrade to 4.0 or 4.1 from anybut but the > > *latest* version in the 3.x series. I sure hope we adopt the same policy > > here. > > Agree, I don't see any use in supporting upgrades without going through > 4.x-STABLE first. It's nice that you guys are in agreement on that fact, but perhaps you'd like to do something constructive like to look at and review the patches? Avoiding the install of a new make during a build is highly desirable, even if you don't believe in updating from old RELENG_4. Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Projects robert@fledge.watson.org Network Associates Laboratories To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.NEB.3.96L.1021201121130.75329A-100000>